WaterManip/IceSpike + PhaseChange = Switch

Pur3_Fox · May 4, 2015

icespike should really be merged with watermanip tho if you wanna stay true to the show

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

.

djmyernos said:
Lol I mean wouldn't that be easier to accomplish a water/ice barrage?

accomplish what?

djmyernos · May 4, 2015

If you want to bombard someone with water and ice, just switch between watermanip and iceblast. I get what you're doing here, and it does sound cool, but if you're just trying to get water and ice together, then I'd say just switching between watermanip and iceblast. But, I'm not usually a waterbender, so maybe there's something that I'm not seeing.

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

Just edited the title of this thread
@Vidcom please readded the "looking into" prefix.

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

djmyernos said:
If you want to bombard someone with water and ice, just switch between watermanip and iceblast. I get what you're doing here, and it does sound cool, but if you're just trying to get water and ice together, then I'd say just switching between watermanip and iceblast. But, I'm not usually a waterbender, so maybe there's something that I'm not seeing.

This is for expanding the use of phasechange i would say. I want to spice up those move combination with phasechange ,making look cool like you said.

djmyernos · May 4, 2015

HydroMan said:
This is for expanding the use of phasechange i would say. I want to spice up those move combination with phasechange ,making look cool like you said.

Ah...ok. In that case, then I could see it working.

LeafHD_ · May 4, 2015

Where does the literal spike go?

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

LeafHD_ said:
Where does the literal spike go?

its not
It's a icespike projectile ,not a spike.

Pur3_Fox · May 4, 2015

HydroMan said:
its not
It's a icespike projectile ,not a spike.

he means its the little 1 block of ice that u shoot out when using the icespike move

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

Pur3_Fox said:
he means its the little 1 block of ice that u shoot out when using the icespike move

if its not the spike ,then i don't get is question nevertheless.

Pur3_Fox · May 4, 2015

HydroMan said:
if its not the spike ,then i don't get is question nevertheless.

i was talking to the other guy sorry just clearing up his question for you

Pur3_Fox · May 4, 2015

you really shouldnt have to kiss anyones ass for this to be added, its a revolutionary idea that will slowly but surely change the face of waterbending

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

Pur3_Fox said:
i was talking to the other guy sorry just clearing up his question for you

oh..

then you could have qoutes his reply instead of mine

Pur3_Fox said:
you really shouldnt have to kiss anyones ass for this to be added, its a revolutionary idea that will slowly but surely change the face of waterbending

I wasn't beggen for this to be added . I just like how would it add a detail to phasechange with a small adjustment of it. Still ,thanks for all your support

Pur3_Fox · May 4, 2015

HydroMan said:
oh.. then you could have qoutes his reply instead of mine

I wasn't beggen for this to be added . I just like how would it add a detail to phasechange with a small adjustment of it. Still ,thanks for all your support

ik not begging that was the wrong word for me to use to describe it, i mean you shouldnt be argueing about it as its a legit an awesome move

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

Pur3_Fox said:
ik not begging that was the wrong word for me to use to describe it, i mean you shouldnt be argueing about it as its a legit an awesome move

was i really arguing?

Hero · May 4, 2015

Why wouldnt watermanipulation and icespike be one? Water Manipulation isnt a move in avatar, its a thing. I was thinking instead of freezing it and such, you just grab it from water for water and ice to ice.

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

Thats a very good idea. I recommend you should make a suggestion for the icespike (projectile) be merged into one move - watermanipulation and leave the spike attack for icespike. I can say that way it would be best. Thought ,i still wanna leave the suggestion for the combination phasechange ,as it might be potentianal of switching between the states of water where watermanipulation block would be determined by a source block

Hero · May 4, 2015

HydroMan said:
Thats a very good idea. I recommend you should make a suggestion for the icespike (projectile) be merged into one move - watermanipulation and leave the spike attack for icespike. I can say that way it would be best. Thought ,i still wanna leave the suggestion for the combination phasechange ,as it might be potentianal of switching between the states of water where watermanipulation block would be determined by a source block

Hey, yours is looking into, so I wont interfer

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

Hero said:
Hey, yours is looking into, so I wont interfer

No, i'm really up for that idea

. I urge you to do so. If it gets look into ,I would then add to my post that tied with your watermanipulation adjusment ,the block state could be changed with phasechange ignoring by the source block it was choosen to project out.

HydroMan · May 4, 2015

Hero said:
Hey, yours is looking into, so I wont interfer

No, i'm really up for that idea

. I urge you to do so. If it gets look into ,I would then add to my post that tied with your watermanipulation adjusment ,the block state could be changed with phasechange ignoring by the source block it was choosen to project out.