dat hook kick to a leg sweep tho. I love dis gif xD@Finn_Bueno_ you never cease to amaze me. Such creativity, imagination, and basic understandings of coding. Even not has a coder, your explanations were spot on. I understood the codes and stuff, but this change is great.
This is realistic because when Korra fought equalists; the equalists paralyzed her but the paralysis only prevents her from bending not her general movement:
Who says the right term is being used here? In our world paralyze is meant to immobilize someone, but you don't know about that world.They actually did indeed paralyze her, leaving her felt down to the ground with Mako. Also, If they actually did try to do paralyze of the sake to just blocking her bending but not immobilizing her, it wouldn't then be called PaRaLyZe ,would it? Pay attention to what words you are using
words*
No, it would be term, "Who says the right words is being used here?" would be incorrect. That is almost as bad as "Is you here?".
That's more of a RapidPunch but I don't like the current paralyze at all.
There are things that separate Minecraft Bending and Avatar Bending, for the sake of Minecraft Bending, there are just some realism sacrifices we have to make to improve gameplay. And making a bender "fall" down is not exactly what I impicture chiblocking. They are technically immobilizing her bending. I just don't know, but for me, paralyzing her bending would maintain more balance than full out immobilizing the bender's entire movement..They actually did indeed paralyze her, leaving her felt down to the ground with Mako. Also, If they actually did try to do paralyze of the sake to just blocking her bending but not immobilizing her, it wouldn't then be called PaRaLyZe ,would it? Pay attention to what words you are using
I dont like this. This can be easily done with QuickStrike and SwiftKickEllo people!
I've been reading the recent discussions on the forums about the chi blocker's ability 'paralyse'. This ability is completely unrealistic IMO. So, I thought about a change for it. Here's my idea.
Paralyse would get 2 uses. The first one is activated by just clicking, the second one by clicking + shifting.
Both options represent blocking the chi paths in one of the limbs of the body of the target. The first option blocks the chi paths in the arms, the second options blocks the chi paths in the legs.
- When you hit your opponent, without holding shift, the 'PlayerAnimationEvent' would get cancelled for as long as the duration says in the config. This means, that the opponent is not able to left click, for as long as the duration says in the config.
- When you hit your opponent, while holding shift, the 'PlayerToggleSneakEvent' would get cancelled for as long as he duration says in the config. This means, that the opponent is not able to shift, for as long as the duration says in the config.
Both options would activate a cooldown. There could be 2 options for cooldowns, the first one is activated by just hitting, the second one if you hold shift as well.
Lemme know what you think!
If you don't like this idea, please tell me WHY!
- Finn
Reread it then please, it is a completely different concept that simply can't be achieved yet. It's also a replacement for the current Paralyze.
I did. Dont asume just because I dont like it, it means I didnt read it.
I didn't. It's just a fact that what I suggested is not possible yet.
Not sure what you mean by that, but I found one flaw with waterbending and earthbending to be change how BlueGhost said that: If PlayerAnimationEven and PlayerToggleSneakEvent does infact stop the player from clicking and not the trigger to bend, then WB and EB would be able shift and click when selecting their source. This won't make any sense for them to move while others cannot, and this might even be hardd/conflicting to make this happen, as it would be probably impossible for the game to know whenever the player is about to select the source, to activate the corresponding event for the player to accomplish the thing (unless this events only stops the vanilla interactions but not the bendings).
So Finn, what do u think?
Thats what I pretty much said, lol. Paralyze shouldn't be called paralyze, if it doesn't stop the victim from moving.
