Denied Tremorsense

[HydroMan]

I just got an idea on how tremorsense could help you for mining, which is so very similar to seismicsense in the show. Even tho I think it could be denied still .-.

mehh. I'm gonna still make a suggestion and hope that would be atleast consider be worthy as an feature

 

[Finn_Bueno_]

Thats not the case. It is just pointless to bind it ,if we can already do it without its bind. And if we can already do it without binding it,whats the point of having an the ability of it really? Thats like having a passive to not take falldamage and having a ability called "safeland" which does the same thing as passive one

Shifting deactivates it.

 

[HydroMan]

Shifting deactivates it.

IK

 

[Joeri]

Ugh people, if you don't want the ability binded then don't bind it ffs

 

[HydroMan]

Ugh people, if you don't want the ability binded then don't bind it ffs

By that logic ,we should make an air ability "negatefall" which negates the falldamage when fallen. If people decide to not bind it ,they would still negate the damage when fallen. Do you see where i'm going?

 

[Gahshunk]

Here's an idea: Have the seeing ability toggled off by default so I don't get seizures every time I log and and have to toggle it off :c

 

[HydroMan]

Here's an idea: Have the seeing ability toggled off by default so I don't get seizures every time I log and and have to toggle it off :c

Yea that too

 

[Hero]

You do realize that in one of the korra updates, tremorsense is a passive, right?

 

[HydroMan]

You do realize that in one of the korra updates, tremorsense is a passive, right?

"oh really? oh my.. i didn't really know?" -sarcasm

srls have you read the very 1 post of mine??

 

[Hero]

"oh really? oh my.. i didn't really know?" -sarcasm

srls have you the very 1 post of mine??

What? What does "srls have you the very 1 post of mine" even mean?

 

[HydroMan]

srls have you read the very 1 post of mine??

 

[Hero]

OOOOh *Derp* I did. I didnt see it.

 

[Joeri]

By that logic ,we should make an air ability "negatefall" which negates the falldamage when fallen. If people decide to not bind it ,they would still negate the damage when fallen. Do you see where i'm going?

No we shouldnt make an ability of a passive move, tremorsense is different then just the passive

 

[Hero]

No we shouldnt make an ability of a passive move, tremorsense is different then just the passive

OOk, im done.

 

[HydroMan]

No we shouldnt make an ability of a passive move, tremorsense is different then just the passive

how come its diffrent? (besides the smoke thing). If you bind it you will have glowstone beneat your feet. If you don't bind ,you still have glowstone beneat your feet.

 

[Joeri]

how come its diffrent? (besides the smoke thing). If you bind it you will have glowstone beneat your feet. If you don't bind ,you still have glowstone beneat your feet.

Because the smoke and the ability to turn it off

Just because 1 part is a passive, doesn't mean you have to remove the other

 

[HydroMan]

Because the smoke and the ability to turn it off

Just because 1 part is a passive, doesn't mean you have to remove the other

Then make the smoke thing passive too ,then remove the ability afterwards. Or we could, you know... just remove the passive thermosense and just leave as an ability (lol i keep repeating myself).

 

[Joeri]

Then make the smoke thing passive too ,then remove the ability afterwards.

Then make your post include that and how it would work instead of an post with barely any details

 

[Mist]

I'll be the first to say that Tremorsense needs to be reworked, but removing it completely is out of the question. Denied.

 

[Mist]

I'll be the first to say that Tremorsense needs to be reworked, but removing it completely is out of the question. Denied.