Suggestion Waterflow change

[ThePhoenixForce9]

I've been thinking.. Water is all about flow and sources. So maybe instead of having a waterflow just levitate from it's source, the waterflow could just flow out of the water but continue to be connected to its source. I think it would make the most sense because not only will it maybe look a bit more realistic. But enemies now have a chance to counter the move as well, by cutting the flow from its source body of water.

(IF SOMEONE WANTS TO BETTER EXPLAIN WHAT I MEAN PLEASE DO)

 

[Pride]

waterflow is from jedcore

 

[MeskenasBoii]

Yeah, and I have no idea what your suggestion implies

So maybe instead of having a waterflow just levitate from it's source, the waterflow could just flow out of the water but continue to be connected to its source.

Because what I read I can only understand a contradiction in one sentence. Wait, is waterflow no longer connected to the source?

But enemies now have a chance to counter the move as well, by cutting the flow from its source body of water.

You can already. Heck I tried it and it work: raiseearth to cut the stream in half to nullify.

 

[ThePhoenixForce9]

Yeah, and I have no idea what your suggestion implies

Because what I read I can only understand a contradiction in one sentence. Wait, is waterflow no longer connected to the source?

You can already. Heck I tried it and it work: raiseearth to cut the stream in half to nullify.

Waterflow comes from a source, but it leaves it: Im proposing that the stream will always be connected to the water source INSTEAD of the current one, where a set amount of water leaves the source

 

[Pride]

so its like what? water linked to the source?
that makes no sense because you literally used up the water in that source (unless its a massive ocean -- but even then who and how would someone drain an ocean to cut off someone's source?), so that source is what even makes up your waterflow

ETA: ok i might have understood it wrong (what i thought: having the water flow out, but when the source is destroyed, the flow is also destroyed), but it still wouldnt make sense because water isnt limitless xp
i cant really see a plant being able to have that much water in it to be able to have the flow still connected to the source
in an ocean, maybe. but otherwise, i cant really see that

 

[ThePhoenixForce9]

so its like what? water linked to the source?
that makes no sense because you literally used up the water in that source (unless its a massive ocean -- but even then who and how would someone drain an ocean to cut off someone's source?), so that source is what even makes up your waterflow

if I "used up the water" why the water still there then HmM?

 

[Pride]

if I "used up the water" why the water still there then HmM?

... you use up water from the source to be able to actually make the waterflow - which im guessing is from a plant source but if its from an ocean ^^

 

[MeskenasBoii]

Waterflow comes from a source, but it leaves it: Im proposing that the stream will always be connected to the water source INSTEAD of the current one, where a set amount of water leaves the source

Sure. Though If I were to be honest, I don't like that combo anyway for a good reason. So my input doesn't count anyway.

 

[ThePhoenixForce9]

so its like what? water linked to the source?
that makes no sense because you literally used up the water in that source (unless its a massive ocean -- but even then who and how would someone drain an ocean to cut off someone's source?), so that source is what even makes up your waterflow

ETA: ok i might have understood it wrong (what i thought: having the water flow out, but when the source is destroyed, the flow is also destroyed), but it still wouldnt make sense because water isnt limitless xp
i cant really see a plant being able to have that much water in it to be able to have the flow still connected to the source
in an ocean, maybe. but otherwise, i cant really see that

SincE when CAN We USe A wATERfloW FRom A PLANT!@!!!!! Why WaStnT I NoTIFIED

 

[SuperBower118]

Waterflow isn't a part of ProjectKorra's core, so this won't be done. Don't post JedCore-related stuff here; nothing will be done with JedCore by the ProjectKorra Devs. Contact the guy who's updating JedCore these days.

 

[Pride]

^^
and yes we can? (dont quote me on this)

 

[ThePhoenixForce9]

Waterflow isn't a part of ProjectKorra's core, so this won't be done. Don't post JedCore-related stuff here; nothing will be done with JedCore by the ProjectKorra Devs. Contact the guy who's updating JedCore these days.

I dont pay attention to who what where and why posts and makes what moves.. If its bendable Im gonna make a suggestion about it

 

[Pride]

I dont pay attention to who what where and why posts and makes what moves.. If its bendable Im gonna make a suggestion about it

thats pretty implusive
sorry but things dont work like that here. try to at least have an idea about what youre doing/posting

 

[MeskenasBoii]

I dont pay attention to who what where and why posts and makes what moves.. If its bendable Im gonna make a suggestion about it

Thing is, by doing so is as much practical as nailing a poster on a wall other way around, where it shows a blank white paper. PK can't change the ability and I don't think the creator (plush monkey) of the ability checks the forum.