Search results

Pardon? Can you rephrase what you just said?

Instead of that, let's better improve the octopusform ability itself. Octopusform is planned to be changed, and there alot of suggestions floating around that have good changes for it. I didn't, but just in all for the expectation if you ever thought of putting it in as an arguemnet.

Concept Developers don't keep a track of every suggestion, so they most likely forget this post or simply can't find it. Regarding fireballs, I actually see it isn't necessary and it would make the redirection more easier for a player to do - you can punch them by getting close to the...

Yes, it was discussed in the thread by @XxKingKamiKazexX.

I would suggest the same as I suggested for EnergyBending - increase the cooldown and the duration for when the effect wears off. While I find Cyclone I mixture of all the abilities, I do like the technique. With my idea of the vortex forcing the players to spin (I do feel like it needs some...

Before the screenshot, aang created what it look liked an octopusform (heck, in the screenshot looks also similar to technique), not to mention the fact that in the wikia the technique is named "Octopus Form" (assuming that's where the inspiration for the name was taken). In your description, it...

ArchBear_Vega does blacklisting me stop others attacking me? Go figure... and I don't want just that, I want addons to not effect the rest of people. The Only option for that of course deleting from a server, but I want that done on a bigger scale. Sure, pk gives a more intuitive freedom with...

NO!

Welp, I just have an idea how to start it now *hint hint.. wink wink..*

"I Dont Know Why But The WbBendingFlag Thing Does Not Work For Me Anyone Can Help?" Is the side plugin's version compatible with pk?

I do wish PK 1.9.0 will block anyone from hooking pk to create addons.... I know, that so evil of me to think of.

I wasn't saying it is in developmet. I thought it meant that those threads with its label mean it is on the close edge of being introduced into a plugin. If it means "we look at an idea again", I will say that it is one of the useless label's there is, since you people come back to look for...

Like I mentioned, they usually don't put thought into them themselves, so they denied them right of a bat. To recap clearer, this goes to the ability threads that dominate an pre-existing ability. I suggest you think one for yourself, If you don't wish this to get this locked and rejected.

What about "revisiting" tag? They seem to be differen't from looking into's, so aren you just gonna leave them tag that way for nothing? (I think those threads need to be changed "into development" as well).

Lol, please no! I predict this or the next. They did say they recently began working on it (they even released a sneak peak gif of it), so it might come soon, but not too sooner or less.

Didn't notice your reply when scrolling through the thread, but still - the question was on airswipe. That quote still doesn't tell me what disadvantage this ability has, so no - you didn't answer my question.

It feels like this thread is 1 year old.... Starting now my response to you, yeah I already began to come with a belief that this won't get revived, since nobody care to tell me why this stop when I asked them this question. R.I.P paliate's work.

Well, should I instead suggest that they should remove the system there, lol? That would make my post half accepted and half disagreed, lol.

You haven't answered my question properly. Usually, whenever a concept dev see's a thread with an ability that dominates a copy of another, they usually stamp denied without putting a thought themselves on how it can be turned into a different technique. I see this thread as one of them.

Is it possible to create an enchantment table without the book?